- sådan lyder det i det fedeste blogindlæg, jeg har læst i dag. Det kommer fra Classicaly Liberal-bloggens indlæg med den vidunderlige overskrift: Your right to bear arms end at my property line.
I indlæget skrives — fuld ud korrekt:
This blog doesn’t take second place to anyone when it comes to defending the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. I go further. I argue that the right to self-defense precedes the Constitution and no Constitution can strip citizens of their natural rights. Even if the Second Amendment were abolished the right to keep and bear arms is not legitimately subject to state restriction.
But we must remember that all rights exist within the context of property. That means that one may surrender some rights voluntarily when one enters the property of other people.
My First Amendment right to free speech gives me no claim on your property. You are not required to provide me a podium, a microphone, a printing press or even a spot to stand and proclaim my views. I have the right to use my own resources and those that are freely made available by others but I can not have the right to the property of others.
My freedom of religion doesn’t mean you have to give me a ride to the church of my choice. My rights exist within the framework of my property. Your obligation is to leave me alone but not to provide me with the property or resources that I need even if I need them to exercise some right I have.
My rights cannot create any unwanted claim on you. It merely requires you to NOT use force or fraud against me or my property.
Læs endelig det fulde indlæg. Det er vidunderligt og fuldt ud korrekt, når forfatteren skriver, at ejendomsretten er grundlaget/forudsætningen for religionsfriheden m.v.!
